the Hypocracy of "christ" or the Corruption of the Bible?
Most of the accounts of Jesus that we follow today come from Saul of Tarsus, who knew very little of the life and personality of Jesus. Saul, originally, despised Christians and persecuted them for a living. When he became a "christian", assuming his conversion was genuine, he would have had alot to "attone" for, as well as a lot of internal convincing required for him to make such a life change. I think there's a good chance this is where the "Jesus is the son of god" thing originated. I strongly doubt that if Jesus is who he claimed to be (his message, not his supposed divinity) that he would declair incessantly to be divine.
In essence, if one maintains a sense of logic, one must choose between accepting the fallability of the Bible or accepting the hypocracy of "christ". Though I realize that christians are not generally known for their logic, this is a common sense issue that goes beyond the concept of a "leap of faith".

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home